posted 04-17-2001 06:58 PM            

Now that the nasties (ie, JC and his ilk) are gone, I wouldn't vote anyone off the boards. That is, if I had a vote. Which I don't.

posted 04-17-2001 07:06 PM            

Can't remember their figgin' screennames though.

posted 04-17-2001 07:10 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Nostromo28:
Those damn kids who admitted to posting the same thread topic multiple times on the boards, and blatantly giving themselves glowing reviews of their scripts, using different screennames.

Can't remember their figgin' screennames though.

-Nos

---

posted 04-17-2001 07:22 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Nostromo28:
Those damn kids who admitted to posting the same thread topic multiple times on the boards, and blatantly giving themselves glowing reviews of their scripts, using different screennames.

Can't remember their figgin' screennames though.

-Nos

---

Are you talking about Iamfunny and filmfutre3?

They admitted to being Casey Affleck, but I don't think the rest of it.

Actually I thought their script was hysterical and I think those boys will go far. I still have their pix up as wallpaper at work.

posted 04-17-2001 07:25 PM            

But if their script, was in fact good, I wish them luck. I just think there are more mature ways of posting to the boards.

-Nos

posted 04-17-2001 07:38 PM            

and a few others....not worth mentioning though..

posted 04-17-2001 09:03 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lolo:
I wouldn't vote anyone off. The people I dislike for various reasons provide entertainment.

---

Funny... that's how I feel about you.

Now get back to the "Psichick, let's talk" thread and show us just how far you're willing to shove your foot down your own mouth today.

posted 04-17-2001 09:57 PM            

J/k

theblondewritr
TOOTER!

posted 04-17-2001 10:59 PM            

Hehehehehe

posted 04-18-2001 08:11 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mongoose of War:
Funny... that's how I feel about you.

Now get back to the "Psichick, let's talk" thread and show us just how far you're willing to shove your foot down your own mouth today.

Make me laugh, sucker!

---

mong,
being as that you are so very eager to defend the incompetent, perhaps you'd be willing to adopt Psi's position and defend it.

What do you think, mong? Do you think you'd be willing to even attempt to support anything Psi purports? Or, perchance, goodwill has been misplaced on your part?

posted 04-18-2001 08:14 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lolo:

mong,
being as that you are so very eager to defend the incompetent, perhaps you'd be willing to adopt Psi's position and defend it.

What do you think, mong? Do you think you'd be willing to even attempt to support anything Psi purports? Or, perchance, goodwill has been misplaced on your part?

make use of books,
Lolo

---

Keep this thread lighthearted, for Crissakes. If you want to bitch and argue, go back to the "Psichick, let's talk" thread.

posted 04-18-2001 08:14 AM            

Ever heard the expression variety is the spice of life?

And did you know that there are two aisles of books written about the paranormal at Crown books in Annapolis? So how do books fit into your whole "jumping down poor psichick's throat at every opportunity" mindset?

posted 04-18-2001 08:18 AM            

TOOTER MCGRUFF
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

posted 04-18-2001 08:19 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by burger:
CDN!!!! no..no no. as long as i'm here you better be here.

Who would i vote off?!?!?! Nos, c'mon, this is a sincerely dangerous thread. If they should be voted off, more than likely they know who they are.

---

Oh, in that cae, I'm leaning towards myself.

posted 04-18-2001 08:22 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by dharris:
Oh, in that cae, I'm leaning towards myself.

---

posted 04-18-2001 08:29 AM            

Over half of the books in Barnes and Noble are fiction, backgirl, so much for two aisles.

posted 04-18-2001 08:40 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by burger:
CDN!!!! no..no no. as long as i'm here you better be here.

Who would i vote off?!?!?! Nos, c'mon, this is a sincerely dangerous thread. If they should be voted off, more than likely they know who they are.

---

Thanks, Burg!

In all honesty I wouldn't vote anyone off of here. Everyone that I've come in contact has shown the utmost intelligence, and as Lolo pointed out somewhere up there, at the very least has provided a certain level of entertainment.

It's all good.

posted 04-18-2001 08:47 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lolo:
I'm not stalking and harassing PSI.

---

I work as a moderator for a discussion board and your behaviour fits our definition of stalking and harassing, which is a federal crime. Just a little FYI.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lolo:
Over half of the books in Barnes and Noble are fiction, backgirl, so much for two aisles. Lolo

---

Doy, but these books are in the NONfiction section. I'm really not as dumb as you'd like to think I am. So sorry.

posted 04-18-2001 08:54 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by backgroundgrrl:
Doy, but these books are in the NONfiction section. I'm really not as dumb as you'd like to think I am. So sorry.

---

your definition of harassment? i'd say involving oneself in a discussion which specifically asks for another and repeatedly bothering ME would qualify as harassment, but do as you like.

so, if you're not as dumb as I think you are, how dumb are you?

posted 04-18-2001 09:16 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lolo:

your definition of harassment? i'd say involving oneself in a discussion which specifically asks for another and repeatedly bothering ME would qualify as harassment, but do as you like.

so, if you're not as dumb as I think you are, how dumb are you?

off to the bookstore,
Lolo

---

You are so funny, I can't stand it. Who are you really, I guess you wouldn't want to say. Oh well.

First I did not say MY definition of harassing, open your eyes and read big boy.

Secondly I am not going from thread to thread insulting someone who has not been posting to me, so don't even try to say I act the same you do. Sheesh, this whole thing has to be tongue in cheek, nobody could really act like you want us to think you do.

Plus since you keep responding to me, I don't see how I could be bothering you. Am I poking you? Calling you stupid and ignorant? Oh wait that's you that calls other people that, not me. My mistake.

How dumb am I? Not dumb at all.

Let's see, you seem to use SAT's as some sort of benchmark, mine were taken quite a long time ago before they changed, I did score a 97th percentile in English, for whatever that's worth.

One reason I think it's worth nothing is that I took them when I was 15, and started college at 16, so I hadn't had the normal high school learning that helps you do well on those sorts of test.

IQ - another number some people like to play with, I scored a 147.

I think that's about it for now. Tata.

Do let me know what others sorts of standardized testing you look up to so I can let you know.

posted 04-18-2001 09:47 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by darzam:
Moviemax(Kathy)....She has such a potty mouth!!

eyeball fu**ing....sheesh!!

---

Well, what can I say - that's what happens when I hang around a Fred thread.

posted 04-18-2001 10:07 AM            

Duh, I guess that means I'm Kevin Smith!

Did any of you people actually receive any kind of real proof that could be varified?
Think about it. Someone like Wasabi or Coyote could claim to be Harvey's Aunt Martha or Matt's ex-girlfriend.

And even if this 'Casey Affleck' were related somehow to Ben it would still not excuse childish or crud or thoughtless or insensitive actions on their parts.

You people amaze me sometimes.

K. Smith

posted 04-18-2001 10:14 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lolo:

mong,
being as that you are so very eager to defend the incompetent, perhaps you'd be willing to adopt Psi's position and defend it.

What do you think, mong? Do you think you'd be willing to even attempt to support anything Psi purports? Or, perchance, goodwill has been misplaced on your part?

make use of books,
Lolo

---

I already told you that I do not agree with most of what psichick has to say.

But that doesn't mean I should sit back when you and your sychophant roman74 launch into nonsensical tirades consisting of nothing more than defamatory personal remarks and insinuating that you are the gods of reason.

To be honest, I'm more inclined to agree with you on most topics, despite the half-assed ways in which you always conduct yourself and present your "argument."

So just because I think you're acting like a total prick towards psichick, does that mean I have to adopt her opinions and arguments on everything?

Of course not.

force lolo to read the books he claims to cherish,
Mongoose

posted 04-18-2001 10:19 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Gravity:
By someone 'claiming' they are Casey Affleck does not mean they are Casey Affleck, whoever Casey Affleck is supposed to be. Any more than a Lolo claiming she is super-intelligent means she is.

Duh, I guess that means I'm Kevin Smith!

Did any of you people actually receive any kind of real proof that could be varified?
Think about it. Someone like Wasabi or Coyote could claim to be Harvey's Aunt Martha or Matt's ex-girlfriend.

And even if this 'Casey Affleck' were related somehow to Ben it would still not excuse childish, or crud or thoughtless or insensitive actions on their parts.

You people amaze me sometimes.

K. Smith

[This message has been edited by Gravity (edited 04-18-2001).]

---

I don't think you understood the post, I was saying these guys said that was their dually name, not that they were actually Casey.

Just like if I said I was also Sachet, not that I am, but I live near her. I am not saying my real name is Sachet, I am saying I posted under that name.

Make sense?